Home > Financial:金融 > Cov-lite


Cov-lite  淡契约


Cov-lite (“covenant light”) is financial jargon for loan agreements which do not contain the usual protective covenants for the benefit of the lending party. Although traditionally banks have insisted on a wide range of covenants which allow them to intervene if the financial position of the borrower or the value of underlying assets deteriorates, around 2006 the increasing strength of private equity firms and the decreasing opportunities for traditional corporate loans made by banks fuelled something of a “race to the bottom” with syndicates of banks competing with each other to essentially offer ever less invasive terms to borrowers in relation to leveraged buy-outs.


Cov-lite lending is seen as more risky because it removes the early warning signs lenders would otherwise receive through traditional covenants. Against this, it has been countered that cov-lite loans simply reflected changes in bargaining power between borrowers and lenders, and followed from the increased sophistication in the loans market where risk is quickly dispersed through syndication or credit derivatives.



Contents  目录

  • Covenants  条约
  • Concerns  需关注事项
  • 2007 credit crunch   2007年的信贷紧缩
  • References  参考文献
  • External links  外部链接


Covenants  条约

Practise varied, but characteristically, cov-lite loans would remove the requirement to report and maintain loan to value, gearing and EBITDA ratios.


More aggressively negotiated cov-lite loans might also remove:

  • events of default relating to “material adverse change” of the position of the borrower
  • requirement to deliver annual accounts to the banks
  • restrictions on other third party debt
  • restrictions on negative pledges
  • requirements for bank approval to change the form of the debtor group’s business


  • 跟借方面临“重大不利变数”有关的违约事件
  • 要求提供给银行的年度账目
  • 限制其他第三方的债务
  • 限制负面的抵押
  • 改变债务人集团的业务形式时需要银行的审批


Concerns  需关注事项

Many at the time were alarmed by the development; The Economist in particular thought it was a concerning and short-sighted development,[1] and the Financial Times endorsed the view of Anthony Bolton of Fidelity Investments who warned on his retirement in May 2007 that cov-lite could be “the tinder paper for a serious reversal in the market.”[2], the movement in the market was inexorable. Others argued that the move to cov-lite was a welcome simplification of loan documentation, and was fully justified as the banks would hedge their risk by transferring exposure to the loan in the CDO market.[3][4] It was also pointed out at the time that cov-lite loans operated in a very similar way to bonds, but at lower values.

当时许多人对事态的发展感到震惊,特别是经济学人期刊认为这是一个令人担心和短视的发展,而金融时报也赞同Fidelity Investment富达投资的Anthony Bolton安东尼博尔顿的看法,他在2007年5月退休时警告说,淡契约可以是“市场上的严重逆转的火绒纸,市场的动向是残酷的。另一些人认为淡契约是个受欢迎被简化了的贷款文件,完全合理,因为银行可以通过对冲去转移贷款在CDO市场面对的风险。当时也有人指出,淡契约式的运作方式类似债券,只是价值比较低。

The high water mark of cov-lite loans came in the acquisition by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, a US private equity firm, by way of a record $16bn cov-lite loan for its buy-out of First Data.

淡契约式贷款的高水位标杆出现在美国的私有股权公司Kohlberg Kravis Roberts,以创纪录的160亿美元通过淡契约式贷款收购了First Data第一数据的案例上。


2007 Credit Crunch 。 2007年的信贷紧缩

The tendency towards cov-lite loans ended abruptly with the 2007 subprime mortgage financial crisis. Some commentators subsequently sought to attribute the credit crunch arising from crisis to cov-lite loans, although the LBO market is almost entirely unconnected with the sub-prime mortgage market in terms of exposure. However, in the credit crunch which ensured, cov-lite loans significantly hampered the ability of banks to step in and both seek to rectify positions which were going bad, and to limit their exposure once matters had gone bad. The suggestion that banks risks were mitigated through the CDO market was difficult to sustain in light of difficulties in that market itself as a result of the credit crunch. In March 2011, the Financial Times reported that in the three months prior, cov-lite loans to the value of $17bn had been issued.



References  参考文献

^ “You only give me your funny paper – Debt markets turn grouchy as creditors ask for more”. The Economist. June 28, 2007.


^ a b “Bolton warns of bubble fuelled by “cov-lite” loans”. Financial Times. May 18 2007. (subscription required)


^ Salmon, Felix (June 12 2007). “A Closer Look at Cov-Lite Loans”. Market Movers. Portfolio.com. BizJournals.


^ Comment, Deal (March 29, 2007). “Through the looking glass with leveraged finance”. Legal Week blogs. Archived from the original on June 30, 2007.

评论,成交(2007年3月29日)“通过眼镜看杠杆融资”。Legal Week部落格,源自原文于2007年6月30日刊登的档案。

^ Tett, Gillian (March 4, 2011). “The return of cov-lites hints at more caution not madness”. (Financial Times) Fidelity Worldwide Investment. Archived from the original on March 4, 2011.



External Links  外部链接

  • Money Terms – “cov-lite”  金钱术语- “淡契约”

Categories  分类

  • Financial terminology  金融术语
  • Contract clauses  合同条款
  • Private equity  私人股本

—— END ——


Source >  Wikipedia at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cov-lite

Translated by > BlogHost — hkTan

Word Count > approx.700 words in English


  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: